The tradeoff is complexity. The microcode must be carefully arranged so that the instructions in delay slots are either useful setup for both paths, or at least harmless if the redirect fires. Not every case is as clean as RETF. When a PLA redirect interrupts an LCALL, the return address is already pushed onto the microcode call stack (yes, the 386 has a microcode call stack) -- the redirected code must account for this stale entry. When multiple protection tests overlap, or when a redirect fires during a delay slot of another jump, the control flow becomes hard to reason about. During the FPGA core implementation, protection delay slot interactions were consistently the most difficult bugs to track down.
9 hours agoShareSave
，更多细节参见heLLoword翻译官方下载
Explore our full range of subscriptions.For individuals。关于这个话题，搜狗输入法下载提供了深入分析
#DJI 로봇청소기#DJI Romo#로봇청소기 보안 취약점#스마트홈 보안#IoT 보안 문제#로봇청소기 해킹 논란#DJI 보안 논란#MQTT 취약점#스마트홈 개인정보 유출#로봇청소기 카메라 보안#IoT 권한 검증 오류#클라우드 보안 문제#생성형 AI 보안 위험#스마트 가전 보안。业内人士推荐搜狗输入法2026作为进阶阅读